Rugby Law Explained: Why Henry Pollock's Try Was Legitimate (2026)

Henry Pollock's try against Sale Sharks sparked a heated debate, but the match officials made the right call. Here's the breakdown.

In the 77th minute, Northampton Saints' Tommy Freeman kicked the ball diagonally in-field, and Pollock gathered it in stride, racing away for a try. The controversy arose from Freeman's position and actions. He was beyond the touchline, out of play, and his right foot was grounded when he kicked the ball with his left.

However, according to the World Rugby laws, the officials' decision was correct. Law 18.2.d states that if a player in touch kicks the ball without holding it, the ball is not considered in touch. Freeman never took possession of the ball, and Pollock was onside, comfortably behind him when the kick occurred.

The officials' interpretation of the law was crucial, ensuring a fair outcome. Despite the confusion, the match officials got it right, and Pollock's try stood. The Saints' victory over Sale was a testament to their skill and strategy, and Pollock's try was a highlight of the game.

Rugby Law Explained: Why Henry Pollock's Try Was Legitimate (2026)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Kimberely Baumbach CPA

Last Updated:

Views: 6485

Rating: 4 / 5 (61 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Kimberely Baumbach CPA

Birthday: 1996-01-14

Address: 8381 Boyce Course, Imeldachester, ND 74681

Phone: +3571286597580

Job: Product Banking Analyst

Hobby: Cosplaying, Inline skating, Amateur radio, Baton twirling, Mountaineering, Flying, Archery

Introduction: My name is Kimberely Baumbach CPA, I am a gorgeous, bright, charming, encouraging, zealous, lively, good person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.